The landscape of college athletics is heavily influenced by the recruiting ratings assigned to high school athletes. Organizations like ESPN, 247 Sports, Rivals and On3 play a pivotal role in this process by evaluating and ranking athletes with designations such as 5-star, 4-star, and 3-star ratings. These ratings serve as benchmarks for college coaches, athletes and fans, shaping the dynamics of college sports recruitment.
To understand the impact of these ratings, it’s essential to recognize how they are formulated. Recruiting services employ a combination of scouting reports, game footage analysis and performance at camps and combines to assess athletes.
A 5-star rating typically denotes a prospect with exceptional talent and potential to significantly impact a college program, and is often targeted by top-tier Division I schools.
A 4-star rating denotes a standout player with the potential to make substantial contributions.
A 3-star rating denotes a solid player with the potential to develop further at the collegiate level.
These rankings can also provide a baseline to predict NIL earnings during each athlete’s time in college. A more highly-ranked player has a higher potential to earn NIL from a collective or brand.
These ratings influence various aspects of college athletics:
Recruitment Strategy: College coaches rely on these ratings to prioritize their recruitment efforts. A high star rating can elevate an athlete’s profile, making them a prime target for scholarships and, in this case, NIL earning potential.
Media Attention and Hype: Highly-rated recruits garner significant media attention, generating buzz and excitement among fans and stakeholders. This media coverage can elevate the profile of both the athlete and the school recruiting them.
Program Perception and Prestige: The accumulation of high-star recruits on a roster can enhance the perceived prestige of a college program. Programs consistently attracting top-rated athletes are often seen as powerhouses, attracting further interest from recruits and fans alike.
Collective NIL Payments: Collectives have a finite amount of funding per year. The collective has to optimize their funding in order to attract the highest profile recruits, as well as to fill out the rest of their roster. More highly-rated recruits will demand more NIL money, and thus flock to programs that can provide it.
The evolution of recruiting ratings has been marked by increasing sophistication and reliance on advanced metrics and technology. These organizations continuously refine their evaluation processes to provide more accurate and predictive assessments of an athlete's potential. The influence of recruiting ratings extends beyond the initial recruitment phase. They often set expectations for an athlete’s performance at the collegiate level and can impact draft prospects for those aspiring to professional sports careers.
READ MORE
NIL Royalties 101 - Investing in Sports NIL Royalties
NIL Royalties 101 - The Role of NIL Collectives
